Quantcast
Channel: Iran – Flüchtlingshilfe Iran e.V. 2010
Viewing all 782 articles
Browse latest View live

VICE| DIE MODE-RENAISSANCE DES IRAN

$
0
0

//embeds.vice.com/?playerId=YjMwNmI4YjU2MGM5ZWRjMzRmMjljMjc5&aid=vice.com/the-vice-report&vid=Q5ZTlkcTpZrbqEmAhM9JkTUPdXwTJa5p&embedCode=Q5ZTlkcTpZrbqEmAhM9JkTUPdXwTJa5p&cust_params=embdom%3Dhttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.vice.com%2Fde%2Fthe-vice-report%2Fdie-mode-renaissance-des-iran-222%26topic%3Dfashion%26aid%3Ddie-mode-renaissance-des-iran-222%26auth%3DVICE+Staff%26keywords%3DIran%2CMODE%2CMode+im+Iran%2CIslam%26ac%3Dno%26country%3Dde%26contentId%3DQ5ZTlkcTpZrbqEmAhM9JkTUPdXwTJa5p&ad_rule=1&description_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.vice.com%2Fde%2Fthe-vice-report%2Fdie-mode-renaissance-des-iran-222&autoplay=1&share_url=http://www.vice.com/de/the-vice-report/die-mode-renaissance-des-iran-222

Vor der Islamischen Revolution im Iran 1979 musste niemand das islamischen Vorschriften entsprechende Gewand, auch als Hidschab bekannt, tragen. Die Mode im Iran unterschied sich kaum von dem, was die Menschen in Europa oder den USA trugen. Nach der Revolution wurde der Hidschab jedoch gesetzlich vorgeschrieben.

Obwohl der gewöhnliche schwarze Hidschab besonders in ländlichen Gegenden noch weit verbreitet ist, gibt es aktuell eine Fashion-Renaissance im Iran und Städte wie Teheran werden zur Heimat von jungen und innovativen Designern. Die Kleidung muss zwar immer noch islamischen Vorschriften entsprechen, doch so strahlende Farben und Designs zu zeigen, wäre vor zehn Jahren im Iran gar nicht denkbar gewesen.

Letzten Sommer hat VICE in Teheran die dritte jährliche Fajr Fashion Show besucht und mit einigen der neuen iranischen Designer gesprochen. Die höchsten Vertreter des Landes hatten eine Genehmigung für die Show erteilt und saßen alle in der ersten Reihe, um ihre Unterstützung kundzutun. Und um sicherzugehen, dass die Models sich an das Gesetz hielten.


Einsortiert unter:Frauen Mode, Iran after Election 2013, Mode Tagged: Frauen, Iran, Mode

Badische Zeitung| Fotograf porträtiert Rockbands in Teheran – anonym

$
0
0

Verbotene Bilder einer verbotenen Musik: Ein Fotograf, der anonym bleiben muss, porträtiert Rockbands in Teheran.

  1. „Wir warten noch immer, dass ein Retter auftaucht, selbstzufrieden mit dem, was wir verloren haben. Menschen, die entscheiden, für ihre Freiheit einzustehen, verbringen ihr Leben hinter Gittern“, schreibt Mareza (29) von der Band Vandida. Und weiter: „Wenn du in London Musik machst, ist es echt, egal wie deine Musik ist. Aber hier bleibt es ein Traum, egal wie ernst du es meinst.“ Foto: Anonym

  2. Die Country-Rock- Band Thunder gab im Januar ein staatlich genehmigtes Konzert vor 1400 Zuschauern – inklusive Nebel-maschine. Sänger Ardavan Anzabipour (eingekreist) glaubt an die neue Regierung. Er schrieb auf das Foto den Satz: „Du wirst sein, was du willst so sehr du es willst!“ Foto: Anonym

  3. „Einen Berg kann man nicht anketten – versuche, ein Berg zu sein“, singt Behnaz. von der Band Pi. Ihren Gitarristen hat sie auf Facebook kennen-gelernt. Der schreibt: „Ich starb, als ich die Wahrheit begriff, und ich wurde in eine neue Welt geboren, als ich musikalische Harmonie erkannte.“ Foto: Anonym

  4. Milad Mardakheh, der Sänger der Band Achromatic, schrieb den Song „Schilde und Revolver“ über das brutale Vorgehen der Regierung bei der Grünen Revolution 2009. „Lebe für das sterbende Licht der Hoffnung in dieser Hölle.“ Foto: Anonym

  5. 2007 gegründet, spielt die Band Achromatic Nu Metal und Alternative. „Leben wir in einem perfekten Traum?“ Foto: Anonym

  6. „Wir warten noch immer, dass ein Retter auftaucht, selbstzufrieden mit dem, was wir verloren haben. Menschen, die entscheiden, für ihre Freiheit einzustehen, verbringen ihr Leben hinter Gittern“, schreibt Mareza (29) von der Band Vandida. Und weiter: „Wenn du in London Musik machst, ist es echt, egal wie deine Musik ist. Aber hier bleibt es ein Traum, egal wie ernst du es meinst.“ Foto: Anonym

  7. Die Country-Rock- Band Thunder gab im Januar ein staatlich genehmigtes Konzert vor 1400 Zuschauern – inklusive Nebel-maschine. Sänger Ardavan Anzabipour (eingekreist) glaubt an die neue Regierung. Er schrieb auf das Foto den Satz: „Du wirst sein, was du willst so sehr du es willst!“ Foto: Anonym

e spielen Gitarre, eine Frau singt, sie tanzen: All das ist illegal. Im Iran kann sich Jugendkultur nur im Untergrund entfalten. Ein ausländischer Fotograf, der anonym bleiben muss, hat jahrelang um das Vertrauen der Musiker geworben. Hier einige seiner Bilder – Collagen aus beschrifteten Polaroids und Aufnahmen von Gebäuden in Teheran.
Im Festsaal einer Musikschule dreschen am helllichten Tag junge Männer auf Gitarren ein. Vor ihnen sitzen Jungs auf der einen, Mädchen mit Kopftüchern auf der anderen Seite. Es gibt Tee, kein Bier. Keiner singt mit, keiner wippt, keiner tanzt. So sieht ein staatlich genehmigtes Rockkonzert im Iran aus. Erschad, das Ministerium für Kultur und islamische Führung, und die Moralpolizei wachen darüber, dass das so bleibt.

Dabei gibt es im Iran alles, was es im Westen auch gibt. Kurze Röcke, Drogen und Alkohol, Prostituierte, Regimekritik und wilde Partys.

Freiheit, nur eben im Verborgenen, hinter Mauern und Fassaden, in Kellern, im Dunkeln, wenn die Nacht hereinbricht, auf dem Land, wo keiner hinschaut. Die Iraner kiffen am Steuer und jammen in der Küche. Doch sie dürfen sich dabei nicht erwischen lassen, Feiern ist genauso strafbar wie Homosexualität und Ehebruch. Für illegale Partys lautet die Strafe Peitschenhiebe, für Alkoholkonsum Gefängnis und im wiederholten Falle sogar Hinrichtung.

Vollständiger Artikel


Einsortiert unter:Ali Khamenei, Civil Rights, Musik, Underground Tagged: Bands, Iran, Musik, Teheran, Underground

NZZ| Iran verteidigt seine Menschenrechtspolitik

$
0
0

Iran hat vor dem Uno-Menschenrechtsrat in Genf seine Menschenrechtspolitik verteidigt. Delegationschef Mohammed Dschawad Laridschani verwies stattdessen auf Fortschritte im Bereich Frauen- und Kinderrechte und im Kampf gegen Terrorismus und Drogen.

Es ist bereits das zweite Mal, dass sich Iran vor dem Uno-Menschenrechtsrat einem Prüfverfahren unterziehen muss. Diverse Organisation der Zivilgesellschaft hatten fehlende Fortschritte in der Menschenrechtspolitik der Islamischen Republik seit dem ersten Bericht vor vier Jahren bemängelt.

Im Verlauf der Debatte zeigte sich der Schweizer Vertreter, Botschafter Alexandre Fasel, besorgt über die zunehmende Zahl der Todesstrafen. Er bemängelte das Fehlen von gerechten Verfahren, vor allem im Fall der am vergangenen Sonntag gehängten Reyhaneh Dschabbari.

Quelle: NZZ Ticker


Einsortiert unter:Human Rights, Menschenrechte, Mohammed Dschawad Laridschani Tagged: Genf, Iran, Menschenrechte, Mohammed Dschawad Laridschani, Reyhaneh Dschabbari., UNO-Menschenrechtsrat

Iran – 20th Session of Universal Periodic Review

$
0
0

https://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1722935254001/?bctid=3868635228001&autoStart=false&secureConnections=true&width=480&height=270

Mr. Mohammad Javad Ardeshir Larijani, Secretary of the High Council for Human Rights of Islamic Republic of Iran (Introduction)

2. South Africa, Ms. Noumisa Pamella Notutela

00:22:17

3. Spain, Mr. Luis Ángel Redondo Gómez

00:23:33

4. Thailand, Mr. Thani Thongphakdi

00:24:50

5. Egypt, Mr. Essameldin Abdelhamid Mowad Ashour

00:26:04

6. Sweden, Mr. Jan Knutsson

00:28:30

7. Switzerland, Mr. Alexandre Fasel

00:29:42

8. Syrian Arab Republic, Mr. Hussam Eddin Aala

00:30:44

9. Sri Lanka, Mr. Ravinatha P. Aryasinha

00:33:19

10. The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Mr. Dusko Uzunovski

00:34:36

11. Tunisia, Mr. Sami Bougacha

00:35:42

12. Turkmenistan, Mr. Hemra Amannazarov

00:37:02

13. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Mr. Mark Matthews

00:38:18

14. United States of America, Mr. Keith Mr. Harper

00:39:24

15. Uruguay, Mr. Patricio Silva Muñoz

00:40:35

16. Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of), Ms. Luisa Rebecca Sánchez Bello

00:42:07

17. Viet Nam, Ms. Mai Lien Vu

00:43:09

18. Yemen, Mr. Ali Mohamed Saeed Majawar

00:44:29

19. Zimbabwe, Mr. Charles Chishiri

00:45:46

20. Afghanistan, Mr. Atiqullah Murad

00:47:02

21. Algeria, Ms. Zahira Abed

00:48:20

22. Angola, Mr. Apolinário Jorge Correia

00:49:35

23. Argentina, Ms. Marina Mantecon Fumado

00:50:38

24. Armenia, Ms. Hasmik Tolmajyan

00:51:49

25. Australia, Ms. Tanya Bennett

00:53:03

26. Austria, Mr. Karl Prummer

00:54:09

27. Bahrain, Mr. Yusuf Abdulkarim Bucheeri

00:55:37

28. Bangladesh, Mr. Shameem Ahsan

00:56:57

29. Belarus, Ms. Inna Vasilevskaya

00:58:12

30. Belgium, Mr. Pierre Gillon

00:59:25

31. Benin, Ms. Maurille Biaou

01:00:47

32. Bhutan, Ms. Tashi Peldon

01:01:54

33. Bolivia, Ms. María Natalia Pacheco Rodriguez

01:03:05

34. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Ms. Snežana Višnjić

01:04:25

35. Brazil, Ms. Regina Maria Cordeiro Dunlop

01:05:37

36. Brunei Darussalam, Ms. Nurussa’adah Muharram

01:06:55

37. Burkina Faso, Ms. Myriam Claudine Yabiyuré Poussi

01:08:08

38.

01:09:22

39. Canada, Ms. Elissa Golberg

01:10:41

40. Chad, Mr. Malloum Bamanga Abbas

01:56:14

41. Chile, Ms. Marta Maurás

01:57:33

42. China, Ms. Danhui Song

01:59:06

43. Costa Rica, Ms. Elayne Whyte Gómez

02:00:20

44. Cuba, Ms. Anayansi Rodríguez Camejo

02:01:38

45. Cyprus, Mr. Andreas Ignatiou

02:02:48

46. Czech Republic, Mr. Victor Velek

02:03:59

47. Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Mr. Se Pyong So

02:05:02

48. Denmark, Ms. Sisse Norman Canguilhem

02:06:18

49. Djibouti, Mr. Ahmed Mohamed Abro

02:07:30

50. State of Palestine, Ms. Nada Tarbush

02:08:41

51. Eritrea, Mr. Bereket Woldeyohannes

02:09:51

52. Estonia, Mr. Jüri Seilenthal

02:11:21

53. Ethiopia, Mr. Ephrem Bouzayhue Hidug

02:12:35

54. Finland, Mr. Stefan Lee

02:13:39

55. France, Mr. Nicolas Niemtchinow

02:14:43

56. Germany, Mr. Joachim Rücker

02:16:07

57. Ghana, Ms. Laila Heward-Mills

02:17:19

58. Greece, Mr. Alexandros Alexandris

02:18:25

59. Guatemala, Mr. Juan Antonio Benard Estrada

02:19:48

60. Hungary, Ms. Zsuzsanna Horváth

02:21:01

61. Iceland, Mr. Thórdur Sigtryggsson

02:22:12

62. India, Ms. Gloria Gangte

02:23:23

63. Indonesia, Mr. Triyono Wibowo

02:24:45

64. Iraq, Mr. Abdel Kareem Al-Janabi

02:25:45

65. Ireland, Ms. Breda Lee

02:27:05

66. Israel, Mr. Eviatar Manor

02:28:09

67. Italy, Ms. Simona Battiloro

02:29:40

68. Japan, Mr. Kotaro Suzuki

02:30:57

69. Kazakhstan, Mr. Bakbergen Koishibayev

02:32:13

70. Kuwait, Mr. Jamal M.I. Alghunaim

02:33:35

71. Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Mr. Xayfhong Sengdara

02:34:50

72. Latvia, Mr. Rolands Ezergailis

02:36:13

73. Lebanon, Ms. Najla Riachi Assaker

02:37:16

74. Lithuania, Mr. Rytis Paulauskas

02:38:34

75. Luxembourg, Mr. Jean-Marc Hoscheit

02:39:45

76. Malaysia, Ms. Raja Intan Nor Zareen

02:41:22

77. Mali, Mr. Amadou Opa Thiam

02:42:36

78. Mauritania, Ms. Fatma Isselmou

02:43:48

79. Montenegro, Mme Zorica Marić-Djordjević

02:45:13

80. Myanmar, Mr. Maung Wai

02:46:31

81. Netherlands, Mr. Roderick Van Schreven

02:47:24

82. New Zealand, Mr. Carl Allan Reaich

02:48:36

83. Nicaragua, Mr. Néstor Cruz Toruño

02:49:29

84. Niger, Mr. Issoufou Garba

02:50:48

85. Nigeria, Mr. Patrick C.Y. Gbemudu

02:51:59

86. Norway, Ms. Harriet E. Berg

02:53:21

87. Oman, Mr. Abdulla Nasser Al Rahbi

02:54:41

88. Pakistan, Mr. Aamar Aftab Qureshi

02:56:13

89. Paraguay, Ms. Raquel Cristina Pereira Farina

02:57:35

90. Peru, Ms. Claudia Portillo Gonzáles

02:58:56

91. Poland, Mr. Jerzy Baurski

03:00:20

92. Portugal, Ms. Ana Helena Pinheiro Marques

03:01:34

93. Qatar, Mr. Almuhannad A. Al-Hammadi

03:03:09

94. Republic of Korea, Mr. Ye Se-Min

03:04:22

95. Romania, Ms. Maria Ciobanu

03:05:31

96. Russian Federation, Ms. Anastasia Bogdatieva

03:06:36

97. Senegal, Mr. Serigne Dieye

03:07:45

98. Sierra Leone, Ms. Yvette Stevens

03:09:08

99. Singapore, Mr. Steven Pang

03:10:27

100. Slovakia, Mr. Martin Kmošena

03:11:38

101. Slovenia, Mr. Vojislav Šuc

03:12:48

102. Uzbekistan, Mr. Javohir Nurmetov

03:14:05

103. Mexico, Mr. Jorge Lomónaco

03:15:21

104. Mr. Mohammad Javad Ardeshir Larijani, Secretary of the High Council for Human Rights of Islamic Republic of Iran (Final Remarks)

03:16:48

Source: UN TV


Einsortiert unter:Ali Khamenei, Genf UPR, Mohammad Javad Ardeshir Larijani Tagged: 20th Session of Universal Periodic Review, Civil Rights, Genf, Human Rights, Iran

Strange Triangle: Iran, Armenia, and Azerbaijan

$
0
0

Iran, Armenia and Azerbaijan are intimates. Iran lost both lands to Russia in the 19th century, but both countries’ peoples form large minorities in Iran: 150,000 Armenian Christians live in Iran, while there are more Turkic-speaking Shia Muslim Azeris in Iran—15 to 18 million—than in Azerbaijan itself. Moscow’s rule limited Iran’s relations with both countries, but when the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, Iran quickly recognized the two new independent states. Yet relations took a surprising turn: where Iran might have been expected to relish the opening of a Shia Muslim neighbor, Azerbaijan’s ethnic nationalism and irredentism pushed Iran closer to Armenia, which was at war with Azerbaijan. Iran’s preference for its small Christian neighbor persists today.

1. Azerbaijan’s President Elchibey wanted to establish “Greater Azerbaijan” in Iran’s north.

Azerbaijan’s second president, Abulfaz Elchibey, who took office from 1992 to 1993, espoused an anti-Iranian, pro-Turkish, pan-Azeri worldview. Like Soviet Premier Josef Stalin, he imagined uniting Azerbaijan with Azeri-majority territories in Iran’s northeast. “In those early post-independence years,” says Alex Vatanka of the Middle East Institute, “you had a government in Baku that spoke about joining ‘north and south Azerbaijan.’ Azerbaijan went quickly from being seen as fertile ground for Iranian soft power to being seen as a threat to Iranian internal stability.” Elchibey, he says, was inexperienced and sentimental. “There was not much strategic thinking going on his part.”

2. Iran took in thousands of Azerbaijani refugees in 1993.

In 1988, as Moscow’s grip on Armenia and Azerbaijan began to loosen, the two countries went to war over the notionally autonomous border region of Nagorno-Karabakh, whose name derives from the Russian word for “mountainous,” the Turkic word for “black” and the Persian words for “garden.” Ethnic Armenians seized the territory, and pushed into Azerbaijan proper. Fleeing an Armenian offensive in 1993, tens of thousands of Azerbaijanis headed for Iran’s northern border. Iran accommodated them. “If you travel to Baku,” Vatanka says, “they still remember—mostly very fondly—that Iran was there and received them with open arms.” The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict remains unresolved.

3. Iran helps Armenia to survive a Turkish-Azerbaijani blockade.

The war between Armenia and Azerbaijan created a dilemma for Iranian policy makers, since Azerbaijan was a Shia majority country culturally and ethnically intertwined with Iran, but also a potential threat to Iran’s territorial integrity. “Nationalist elements in Azerbaijan advocating a ‘Greater Azerbaijan’ raised alarm within Iran that perhaps they should support Armenia,” says Harout Semerdjian, a PhD candidate in Turkish-Armenian relations at Oxford University. Azerbaijan and Turkey imposed a blockade on landlocked Armenia over the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, but when Azerbaijan lobbied Iran to close its border and minimize its relations with Armenia, he says, Iran refused, becoming “a lifeline with an open border.”

4. Iran and Azerbaijan disputed the origins of polo at UNESCO.

Last year, the Iranian Cultural Heritage Organization wrote to the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization to protest the Azerbaijan Polo Federation’s attempt to register polo with the international cultural body as a sport of Azerbaijani origin. According to Fars News, Mehdi Hojjat, head of the ICHO, protested the move and promised “a tight and continued follow-up on the case.” The Iranian Sports Ministry also objected. Azerbaijan ultimately received special recognition as an “intangible world heritage” a specific form of polo traditionally played on short-legged Karabakh horses, which Azerbaijani Culture and Tourism Minister Abulfaz Garayev said were endangered by the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

5. Azerbaijan has a shadowy friendship with Israel.

In 2009, Wikileaks revealed a US embassy cable from Baku entitled Azerbaijan’s Discreet Symbiosis with Israel, in which Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev says his relationship with Israel is like an iceberg because “nine tenths of it is below the surface.” Israel has cultivated trade and investment with Azerbaijan since 1994. In 2012 the two countries signed a $1.6 billion arms deal. According to a Foreign Policy article published the same year, senior US officials believed Azerbaijan had granted Israel access to old Soviet airfields that it could use as a refuge for its aircraft if it attacked Iran. Azerbaijan denied hostile intentions toward Iran. “I believe that denial is sincere,” Vatanka says. “The Azerbaijanis might want to use Israel as a lever to press the Iranians, but they do not want to get involved in that fight.”

6. Azerbaijan arrested 22 of its citizens over an alleged plot by Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.

In 2012, Azerbaijan charged 22 Azerbaijanis with treason and illegal possession of weapons, and accused them working with the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps to target Israeli and US embassy staff in the country. The Azerbaijani security ministry said they had undergone training in Iran. Unnamed US officials placed the episode in the context of a covert “shadow war” in which Iran had accused the US and Israel of killing Iranian nuclear scientists—a view the alleged plot leader, Balagardash Dashdev, corroborated. Iran denied the plot, and its embassy in Baku stated, “We believe that the glorious people of Azerbaijan understand that this part of the script of Iranophobia and Islamophobia is organized by the Zionists and the United States.”

7. Iran and Armenia both support Syrian President Bashar al-Assad—for very different reasons.

Iran and Armenia both want the regime of President Bashar al-Assad to survive in Syria. But while Iran is fighting to preserve access to its Hezbollah allies in Lebanon through Syrian territory, Armenia relies on Assad to protect the Armenian diaspora in Syria. “Armenia has its biggest diaspora of the Middle East in Syria, Iraq and Lebanon, which is under direct threat from ISIS,” says Ashot Margaryan, Executive Director of the Eurasian Research and Analysis Institute in Yerevan, referring to the trans-national terrorist group that calls itself the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria. The good attitude of Syria’s ruling Alawite minority toward Armenians, he says, explains Armenia’s position, since Armenians fear worse relations with a Sunni successor government. Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan congratulated Assad on his “reelection” in June.

8. An Iranian lawmaker said Iran could annex Baku.

In 2013 Mansour Haqiqatpour, deputy chair of the Security and Foreign Policy Committee in the Iranian parliament, said that 17 cities in the region, including the Azerbaijani capital Baku, might welcome their own re-annexation by Iran. “A movement has started for the annexation of 17 cities in Caucasus, including Azeri cities, to our country, and we hope this goal would be achieved through cooperation of people and all-out support of international bodies,” he said. Haqiqatpour was reacting angrily to a separatist forum that the South Azerbaijan National Liberation Movement had held in Azerbaijan to promote Azeri separatism in Iran.

9. Iran and Armenia have thriving cross-border traffic—including Iranian wine tourists.

“Iranian-Armenians are very aware of their roots,” Semerdjian says. “In recent years, thousands of them have travelled back and forth to Armenia, and have bought property. A lot of them have second residences. Iranian-Armenians are generally successful, and they invest in Armenia.” Non-Armenian Iranians, meanwhile, have developed a taste for strong Caucasian wine, and head to Yerevan for tours of its famous wine cellars. “Ten meters underground, they think Allah is out of range,” one guide told the BBC.

Source: IranWire


Einsortiert unter:Iran Tagged: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Iran

UN-Experte entsetzt über Hinrichtungen im Iran

$
0
0

Die UNO ist besorgt über die steigende Zahl von Hinrichtungen und die Verschlechterung der Menschenrechtslage im lran. Der Jahresbericht des UN-Sonderberichterstatters über die Menschenrechtslage im Iran zieht eine erschreckende Bilanz.

shaheed-400

Der UN-Sonderberichterstatter über die Menschenrechtslage im Iran, Ahmed Shaheed (Bild), hat der Presse am 27. Oktober seinen Jahresbericht vorgestellt. Seit der Wahl des Regime-Präsidenten Rohani im Juni 2013 wurden demnach 852 Menschen im Iran hingerichtet, darunter acht Minderjährige. Damit hat der Iran weltweit die höchste Hinrichtungszahl pro Kopf.

Shaheed äußerte sich schockiert über das Spektrum der Taten, für die im Iran Todesurteile verhängt werden. “Wir haben erlebt, dass ein Mensch hingerichtet wurde, weil er für eine ausländische Organisation gespendet hat”, sagte Shaheed.

Entsetzt zeigte er sich über die Erhängung der 26-jährigen Reyhaneh Jabbari, die am 25. Oktober im Iran hingerichtet wurde, obwohl sich weltweit Menschenrechtler und sogar Regierungen für die Rettung der jungen Frau eingesetzt hatten.

Der UNO-Sonderberichterstatter warf dem iranischen Präsidenten vor, sein Versprechen aus dem Wahlkampf zur Verbesserung der Menschenrechtslage nicht eingehalten zu haben. Seit seinem Amtsantritt 2011 hat der UNO-Experte keine Erlaubnis zum Besuch des Irans erhalten.

Shaheed kritisierte auch die Einschränkung der Pressefreiheit im Iran. Demnach sind derzeit 35 Journalisten in Haft. Mindestens 300 Menschen seien zudem wegen ihres Glaubens inhaftiert, darunter 120 Mitglieder der religiösen Gemeinschaft der Bahai.

Es wird erwartet, dass die UNO-Generalversammlung im November über einen von Kanada eingebrachten Resolutionsentwurf abstimmt, in dem die Verletzung der Menschenrechte im Iran verurteilt wird.

Pressekonferenz des UN-Sonderberichterstatters über die Menschenrechtslage im Iran (Video)

Weitere Informationen


Einsortiert unter:Genf, Präsidenten Rohani, UN, UN-Sonderberichterstatter Tagged: Hinrichtungen, Human Rights, Iran, Law, Präsidenten Rohani, Reyhaneh Jabbari, UN-Sonderberichterstatter

WELT|“Möchte die Stimme derer sein, die sprachlos sind”

$
0
0

Die iranischstämmige Schriftstellerin Bahiyyih Nakhjavani lebt im Exil. Ihre Gedanken aber sind bei ihren verfolgten Glaubensbrüdern von den Bahai im Iran – um die macht sie sich derzeit große Sorgen.

Sie werden verfolgt, inhaftiert und in den Untergrund gezwungen – die etwa 300.000 Anhänger des Bahai-Glaubens im Iran leben unter extremem Druck. 120 Bahai sollen laut des UN-Sonderberichterstatters für Menschenrechte in iranischer Haft sitzen. Viele Anhänger des Glaubens verlassen das Land, denn auch unter der etwas moderater auftretenden Regierung von Präsident Hassan Ruhani hat sich ihre Lage bisher nicht verbessert. Die Schriftstellerin Bahiyyih Nakhjavani beobachtet die Situation der Bahai in ihrem Geburtsland mit großer Sorge. Die 66-Jährige gehört dem Glauben an, war allerdings erst drei Jahre alt, als ihre Eltern mit ihr den Iran verließen. Inzwischen lebt sie als Autorin in Frankreich. Im Jahr 2000 hat sie mit ihrem ersten Roman “Die Satteltasche” einen internationalen Bestseller geschrieben, derzeit arbeitet sie an ihrem neuen Buch über die Diaspora. Mit der “Welt” spricht sie über die Lage der Bahai im Iran, Heimatgefühle und den Einfluss ihres Glaubens auf ihre Arbeit.

Die Welt: Sie wurden im Iran geboren, sind in Uganda aufgewachsen und haben in den USA, Sierra Leone, Zypern, Großbritannien und Belgien gelebt. Mittlerweile wohnen Sie in Frankreich. Wie haben diese vielen Ortswechsel Ihre Arbeit als Autorin geprägt?

Bahiyyih Nakhjavani: Ich habe einige Dinge beobachtet, die mich schockiert haben. Solche Empörung treibt mich sehr stark an, und sie bringt mich dazu, schreiben zu wollen. Ein anderes Mal habe ich etwas gesehen, das Mitgefühl bei mir ausgelöst hat. Dann möchte ich die Stimme derer sein, die selbst sprachlos sind. Das ist ebenfalls ein starker Antrieb für mich, zu schreiben. Ich denke aber, im tiefsten Inneren sind all diese verschiedenen Erfahrungen, das Reisen, der Aufbruch und das Bestreben, irgendwo sesshaft zu werden, eine Metapher für jeden Versuch eines Autors, etwas zu schreiben. Jede weiße Seite ist wie ein neues Land.

Die Welt: Im Alter von drei Jahren haben Sie den Iran bereits verlassen. Fühlen Sie sich trotzdem als Perserin?

Nakhjavani: Die Auswanderung war keine bewusste Entscheidung. Obwohl wir im Ausland lebten, haben wir eine Art persischen Stempel aufgedrückt bekommen.Uganda, wo ich aufgewachsen bin, war britisches Protektorat. Die Hauptstadt Kampala war in drei Sektoren unterteilt: Es gab Inder, Afrikaner und Europäer, die Briten. Wir als persische Familie passten nicht in diese Struktur. Deswegen waren wir dann Perser. Ich will keine Klischees nennen, aber wenn man in einer persischen Familie aufgewachsen ist, dann hat man diesen Geruch in der Nase und dann ist da natürlich noch die Sprache.

Vollständiger Artikel


Einsortiert unter:Ali Khamenei, Bahai, Berlin, Civil Rights, Empfehlungen, Iran, Literatur Tagged: Ali Khamenei, Bahai, Bahá'í Faith, Bahiyyih Nakhjavani, Berlin, Chamenei, Civil Rights, Human Rights, Interview, Iran, Kultur, Literatur, Medien, Menschenrechte

Teheran ist die Hauptstadt für Nasenkorrekturen

$
0
0

von Dina Nayeri

Als ich vorletztes Halloween entschied, mich als moderne Teheranerin zu verkleiden, hatte ich mehrere Monate unter frisch emigrier­ten Iranern zugebracht. Meine neuen Freundinnen-alle moderne Frauen aus Teheran-berieten mich dabei. Für mein Kostüm benötigte ich eine Mischung aus offensichtlichen und überraschenden Requisiten: ein Kopftuch, dessen Enden im Jackie-Kennedy-Stil nach hinten geworfen werden, mehrere Schichten Make-up (die kreischende Eitelkeit der Teheranerinnen und all das), ein hautenges schwarzes Kleid (iranische Frauen lieben es, die Gesetze der Islamischen Republik auszuloten), besonders große Volumeneinsätze fürs Haar (aufgebauschtes Haar ist eine Art kultureller Spleen, ähnlich wie enge Hosen bei europäischen Männern. Im Iran gilt eine hohe Wölbung unter dem Kopftuch als echter Antörner.) Und zum Schluss brachte mein Expertinnenteam noch ein kleines, aber entscheidendes Detail ins Spiel, das meiner Figur der authentischen vornehmen Teheranerin den letzten Schliff verleihen sollte. Sie musterten mich und eine von ihnen meinte, „Dir fehlt noch ein Pflaster auf der Nase.”

„Die Nase hab ich ja schon”, sagte ich und zeigte auf mein einziges gekauftes Körperteil. Seit meinem 18. Lebensjahr weist sie elegant nach oben. Ich mag Amerikanerin sein, aber ich bin auch Perserin, wollte ich damit sagen. Natürlich habe ich mir die Nase machen lassen.

Auf einem Spaziergang durch Teheran trifft man überall auf glamouröse Frauen mit Hijabs und teuren Sonnenbrillen, deren Nasen an markanter Stelle „Ehrenpflaster” zieren, oft lange, nachdem die Wunden abgeheilt sind. Die Befürchtung, damit die Obrigkeit vor den Kopf zu stoßen, haben sie nicht.

Für viele junge Perserinnen ist diese Art der Zurschaustellung durchaus sinnvoll, vor allem wenn es darum geht, einen guten Ehemann zu finden. Das Pflaster ist ein Zeichen dafür, dass die Frau aus einer Familie kommt, die für sie sorgt und es sich leisten kann-was allemal besser ist, als lediglich die genetischen Anlagen für ein kleines Näschen zu haben.

Im Iran werden im Vergleich weltweit die meisten Nasenkorrekturen durchgeführt. Schätzungen zufolge lassen sich dort viermal so viele Leute die Nase machen wie in Amerika. Gerade für ein islamisches Land ist das bemerkenswert, und laut einerGuardian-Story vom März 2013 beschränkt sich diese Praxis nicht nur auf die Reichen; auch Verkäuferinnen, Büroangestellte, Studentinnen und Teenager geben ihre Ersparnisse für die OP aus oder verschulden sich dafür. Obwohl Schönheitsoperationen innerhalb der Kultur mittlerweile absolut gängig sind, hat die Islamische Republik bislang kaum Missfallen daran geäußert. In den 1980ern billigte Ajatollah Khomeini die Nasenkorrektur unter Verweis auf Hadith: „Gott ist schön und liebt die Schönheit.” Und doch, wie BBC im Juni 2014 berichtete, zeigt der staatliche Fernsehsender Tehran TV in seinem Programm keine Schauspieler oder Schauspielerinnen mehr, die sich einer Schönheitsoperation unterzogen haben.

Seit der Revolution 1979, die den Schah zu Fall und die Islamische Republik an die Macht brachte, gilt Teheran als die Nasenkorrekturhauptstadt der Welt. Warum kam es ausgerechnet in einem muslimischen Land zu dieser Entwicklung? Es steht außer Frage, dass die iranische Kultur auf das Verhalten der Menschen stärkeren Einfluss hat als der Islam, und für diese hat körperliche Schönheit in all ihren Formen seit Jahrhunderten einen hohen Stellenwert. Unter dieser Voraussetzung scheint folgende Erklärung plausibel: Weil der obligatorische Hijab nur den kleinen runden Ausschnitt des Gesichts als Darstellungsfläche für Schönheit und Ausdruck offen lässt, sind iranische Frauen völlig besessen von ihrem Gesicht. Sie wünschen sich feine, symmetrische und europäische Züge. Und weil so viele junge Frauen bereit sind, sich dafür unters Messer zu legen und zu verschulden, ist die Nasenkorrektur zu einer Art iranischem Initiationsritus geworden. Heute, nach ein paar Jahrzehnten, hat sich dieser Trend auch in der iranischen Diaspora verbreitet. Für viele persische Frauen und einige Männer ist die Operation ein Indikator, nicht nur für körperliche Schönheit, sondern auch für Reichtum und gesellschaftliche Stellung. Im Vordergrund steht weniger die Eitelkeit als der Wunsch, einer Schicht von Iranern anzugehören, die europäisch aussehen, amerikanische Bücher lesen, reisen und einen westlichen Lebensstil pflegen. So wurde die Beseitigung eben jenes persischen Nasenhöckers, der die unverwechselbare iranische Hakennase ausmacht, ironischerweise zu einem identitätsstiftenden Merkmal. Das Schönheitsideal des iranischen Gesichts hat sich offenbar gewandelt, und obwohl die Operation den eindeutig orientalischen Teil des Gesichts verändert, ist dies letztendlich eine sehr iranische Entscheidung.

Wenn dieser Trend jedoch von dem restriktiven Dresscode der Islamischen Republik herrührt, warum hat er sich dann auch in der iranischen Diaspora so ausgebreitet? Und warum begann er sich schon vor 1979 zu entwickeln? Meine Mutter, Großmutter und Tante ließen sich ihre Nasen in jungen Jahren richten, und alle drei sind konservative Frauen. Meine Großmutter, die sich der Operation in den späten 1960er Jahren unterzog, hatte sich die Nase zuvor bei einem Sturz verletzt-was allerdings eine beliebte Ausrede ist. Sie erzählte, der Arzt habe, bevor er den Bruch richtete, gemeint: „Wenn wir schon mal dabei sind, könnten wir Ihre Nase doch auch ein wenig verkleinern.” Meine Mutter und meine Tante taten es ihr in den frühen 1970er Jahren gleich. „Damals hatten das nur sehr wenige andere Mädchen”, sagte meine Mutter, um deren Nase ich sie seit meiner Kindheit beneidet habe. „Das war Luxus. Weil ich aber an der medizinischen Fakultät war, konnte ich es umsonst machen lassen.” Wenn auch eine Seltenheit zur damaligen Zeit, war die Entscheidung dennoch ein Nebenprodukt der iranischen Normen in Bezug auf Ehe und Brautwerben. „Nach ihrer Nasen-OP wollten alle deine Tante heiraten”, erzählte meine Mutter. „Ihre alte Nase … war sehr najoor.” Für dieses tolle Wort gibt es leider keine adäquate Übersetzung. Es bezeichnet jedenfalls etwas tragisch Unschönes.

Dr. Benjamin Rafii, ein persischer Halsnasenohrenchirurg in Los Angeles, hält das Phänomen nicht für eine Reaktion auf den Islam. „Die Iraner verbindet seit 50 Jahren eine enge kulturelle Beziehung mit Europa”, sagt er. „Nach dem europäischen Schönheitsideal haben persische Frauen viele wünschenswerte Schönheitsmerkmale-mandelförmige Augen, volle in einem hohen Bogen verlaufende Augenbrauen, ausgeprägte Wangenknochen; nur die Nase, die häufig auch noch ein auffälliger Höcker schmückt, sticht als zu groß und unförmig heraus. Sie ist das erste Ziel bei kosmetische Optimierungen.”

Als meine Mutter jung war, vor der Revolution und dem obligatorischen Kopftuch, trieb dieser europäische Einfluss viele berühmte Leute auf den Operationstisch. „Damals ließen sich viele iranische Prominente operieren”, erzählte meine Mutter.

In den frühen 1970er Jahren war das Verfahren noch nicht so ausgereift. Anstelle einer modernen Schiene musste meine Mutter eine Tamponade aus gut zweieinhalb Meter Verbandsmull über sich ergehen lassen; sie wurde ihr tief in die Nasenlöcher bis in den Rachen gestopft. In den 60er und 70er Jahren hatte außerdem jeder Arzt seinen eigenen Nasenkorrekturstil. „Wer zum Arzt meiner Schwester ging, hatte danach die gleiche Nase wie sie, flacher und weniger spitz. Wer zu meinem Arzt ging, hatte meine, dünn und spitz. Heute lassen die Ärzte die Patienten aus mehreren Modellen auswählen. Früher hatte jeder Arzt nur ein Modell.”

Auch ich war mit der „persischen Nase” geschlagen. Als verpickelte 17-Jährige in Oklahoma, die ihre Nase am liebsten in Bücher steckte, begann ich mir langsam Gedanken darüber zu machen, wie ich wohl aussehen würde, wenn ich nach Princeton ginge. Meine Mutter wollte nicht, dass ich mich mit Jungs traf, Make-up trug oder sonstige Eitelkeiten auslebte, aber sie fuhr mit mir ohne Vorwarnung in die Praxis eines Schönheitschirurgen und meinte: „Du kannst sie dir machen lassen, wenn du willst.” Ich nahm ihr Angebot dankend an.

Jetzt habe ich nur noch eine Tante, die ihre ursprüngliche Nase behalten hat, und manchmal sehe ich sie und ihre Töchter neidisch an. Ein Teil von mir möchte gern wissen, wie ich wohl mit meiner Nase als Erwachsene ausgesehen hätte. Aber ich sage mir einfach, dass ich durch die OP iranischer geworden bin. Sie ist ein Initiationsritus, den ich mit meiner Mutter, Tante, Großmutter und Tausenden von anderen Frauen aus meinem Heimatland teile. Welche Version von mir ist also persischer? Die Antwort ist kompliziert. Ich kann viele Argumente und Fakten aufführen, aber emotional ist es ein ziemliches Durcheinander. Wann immer ich einen iranischen Freund oder Liebhaber hatte, dessen Nase wie meine alte war, habe ich mich ein wenig zu sehr in ihn verliebt. Heißt das etwa, dass ich mich nach meinem ursprünglichen Gesicht zurücksehne?

Irgendwie war es an jenem Halloween kein gutes Gefühl, dieses Pflaster auf der Nase zu tragen. Den ganzen Abend über fasste ich mir immer wieder an das Pflaster und ertappte mich dabei, wie ich mir vorsichtshalber Erklärungen zurechtlegte. Irgendwann riss ich es ab. Ich sah auch ohne Pflaster iranisch genug aus-ich habe die mandelförmigen Augen, die Augenbrauen, spreche die Sprache, werfe den Schal aufmüpfig nach hinten. Mein Gesicht ist mein Gesicht.

Source: VICE


Einsortiert unter:Ohne Tagged: 5plus1, Iran, Kultur, Nase, Teheran

SZ| Mitten ins Herz des Irans

$
0
0

Auf der Spur mutiger Forscher durch die Wüste Lut, einem Labyrinth zwischen Teheran und dem Persischen Golf.

Lager in der Kalut am frühen Morgen. Langsam beginnt die Sonne zu wärmen – eine Wohltat nach kalter Nacht. Bild: SN/neubronner

Lager in der Kalut am frühen Morgen. Langsam beginnt die Sonne zu wärmen – eine Wohltat nach kalter Nacht.

Mehr als 400 Meter hohe Dünen: Die Ostsande brechen fast jeden Höhenrekord. Bild: SN/neubronner

Mehr als 400 Meter hohe Dünen: Die Ostsande brechen fast jeden Höhenrekord.

Schwer zugänglich, bizarr, kaum bekannt: die Fels- und Sandwüste Dascht-e Lut im Iran ist faszinierend. Doch diese Gegend auf eigene Faust zu queren könnte in einem Fiasko enden. Zwei fast vergessene Protagonisten hatten dies einst trotz solider Kenntnisse nur mit Glück überlebt – ihre Ausrüstung war aus heutiger Sicht bescheiden, Hunger und Durst quälten sie. Am 21. März 1937 schreibt der österreichische Arzt Alfons Gabriel: “Warum lockt den Menschen die Weite, die Ferne, das Unbekannte und Gefahrvolle? Wie haben wir uns danach gesehnt, hierherzukommen!” Mit seiner Frau Agnes war er schon mehrmals im kaum erforschten Persien gewesen. Bei dieser Tour wollte er “durch den großen weißen Fleck auf der Landkarte Irans” ziehen, durch jene südliche Wüste Lut, “die so lange jedes Eindringen verwehrte”. Der Guide hieß Malik Muhammad. Vier weitere Männer (Djihand, Hassan, Ibrahim und Mehdi) sowie acht Kamele zählten zum Tross. Sechs Tage nach dem Aufbruch erreichten sie erschöpft die Oase Keshit.

Die Dascht-e Lut gilt als menschenleer

Gut 75 Jahre später reist man vergleichsweise angenehm. Drei Land Rover, zwei Toyotas, Lebensmittel plus Sprit und Trinkwasser für eine Woche, dazu als Fahrer Ali Rahimi, Ali Astane, Hassan Taavighi, Babak Ghazvinian und dessen Bruder Mehrdad, der Chef von “Extreme Expeditions” in Teheran, reduzieren das Risiko bei diesem Wüstentrip. Zumal Hassan und beide Ghazvinians während der vergangenen 15 Jahre rund 25 Mal ein Gebiet erkundet haben, das knapp doppelt so groß wie Österreich ist. Die Dascht-e Lut gilt als menschenleer. Doch wer einmal dort war, den lässt die Sehnsucht nach ihr nicht mehr los.

Rund 1000 Kilometer Asphaltstraße sind bereits abgespult, turbulente Städte wie Teheran und Yazd schrumpfen zum Nichts. In Shahdad am westlichen Rand der Lut wachsen noch Palmen, kurz vor Heiligabend blüht Oleander, alle Fahrzeuge sind betankt. “Let’s go!”, ruft Mehrdad Ghazvinian. Das Team rollt der Wüste entgegen und stößt auf Dr. Gabriels erste Route von 1933. Was der schwedische Geograf Sven Hedin “Yardang” nannte und im Herzen des Iran “Kalut” heißt, ähnelt aufgegebenen Siedlungen: dachlose Häuser, Minaretts oder Kamine, rostbraune Mauern, Turm neben Turm. Archäologen würden zunächst prähistorische Orte vermuten. Satellitenkameras dokumentierten jedoch, dass es sich hier um Sedimentgestein handelt, das vom Wind geschliffen wurde und als breiter Riegel von Südost nach Nordwest verläuft.

Einsortiert unter:Iran, Reisen Tagged: Dascht-e Lut, Iran, Reise

Iran jails British-Iranian woman who was detained for watching volleyball

$
0
0
British-Iranian law graduate Ghoncheh Ghavami

PHOTO

Ghoncheh Ghavami has been held in Tehran’s notorious Evin Prison for 126 days.

TWITTER: @AMNESTYUK

A British-Iranian woman who was arrested in Iran after trying to attend a volleyball match has been sentenced to one year in jail, local media says, quoting her lawyer.

Ghoncheh Ghavami, a law graduate from London, was arrested in June at a Tehran stadium, where Iran’s national volleyball team was to play Italy.

The 25-year-old went on trial last month.

“According to the verdict she was sentenced to one year,” her lawyer Alizadeh Tabatabaie was quoted in Iranian media as saying on Sunday.

He said the judge had shown him the sentence, but no reason was given for the conviction.

Iranian officials have said Ghavami was detained for security reasons unrelated to the volleyball match.

Britain said on Sunday it was worried about the case and the way Ghavami had been treated.

“We are concerned about reports that Ghoncheh Ghavami has been sentenced to 12 months in prison for ‘propaganda against the state’,” the foreign office said in a statement.

“We have concerns about the grounds for this prosecution, due process during the trial and Ms Ghavami’s treatment whilst in custody.”

The “Free Ghoncheh Ghavami” Facebook page, where her friends and family campaigned for her release, features photographs of her set against the slogan: “Jailed for wanting to watch a volleyball match.”

An update on the page on Sunday appeared to corroborate the one-year sentence but bemoaned the closed-door legal process that has prevailed in the case.

“This morning Ghoncheh’s family and lawyer returned empty handed from branch 26 of revolutionary court,” it said.

“It is not clear to her family and lawyer as to what the current legal basis of her detention is. A fair and just legal process according to Iran’s legal framework is the basic right of every Iranian citizen. Why are these rights not upheld in Ghoncheh’s case?”

Ghavami’s arrest came after female fans and women journalists were told they would not be allowed to attend the volleyball match at Azadi stadium in the capital.

National police chief General Esmail Ahmadi Moghaddam said it was “not yet in the public interest” for men and women to attend such events together.

Women are also banned from attending football matches in Iran, with officials saying this is to protect them from lewd behaviour among male fans.

AFP


Einsortiert unter:Ali Khamenei, Ayatollah Khomeini, Civil Rights Tagged: Ali Khamenei, Civil Rights, Ghoncheh Ghavami, Hassan Rouhani, Human Rights, Iran, Sport, Women, Women Rights

Spiegel| Eheähnliche Partnerschaften in Iran: Liebe im Untergrund

$
0
0

Von Mohammad Reza Kazemi

Ein Paar im Norden von Teheran: Ohne Ehe keine KinderZur Großansicht
AP

Ein Paar im Norden von Teheran: Ohne Ehe keine Kinder

Kaveh und Leila begehren gegen die Traditionen ihres Heimatlandes Iran auf: Sie verweigern sich der Heirat. Junge Leute wie sie treiben die Modernisierung voran – und nehmen das Risiko in Kauf, ausgepeitscht zu werden.

Es sah fast schon so aus, als würden Kaveh und Leila* keine gemeinsame Bleibe finden können. Zweieinhalb Monate lang suchten sie nach einer Wohnung. Dabei mangelt es in der kleinen Stadt Gorgan im Norden Irans, wo sie beisammen leben wollten, nicht an Wohnraum. Doch Kaveh log nicht, wenn er mit den Eigentümern sprach.

“Ich habe überall die Wahrheit gesagt: dass wir nicht verheiratet sind”, sagt er. “Die Makler hatten kein Problem damit – aber die Vermieter sagten immer nein.” Nach schier endloser Suche fanden sie schließlich doch eine Wohnung, die zwar ihre Wünsche nicht erfüllte, dafür hatte aber der Besitzer Verständnis für ihren Familienstand.

Ein persisches Sprichwort besagt: Eine Braut geht im weißen Kleid in das Haus ihres Ehemannes und verlässt es ebenfalls in Weiß. Im Leichentuch. Vor allem junge Iraner sorgen dafür, dass derlei Weisheiten an Aussagekraft über die Gegenwart verlieren. Die Scheidungsrate hat sich in den vergangenen zehn Jahren verdoppelt, inzwischen wird etwa jede fünfte Ehe irgendwann aufgelöst.

Der Kampf um Diskretion

Vor allem aber entscheiden sich immer mehr junge Menschen statt für eine Ehe für eine eheähnliche Partnerschaft, in Iran “weiße Heirat” genannt. Die Paare leben zusammen, ohne verheiratet zu sein. In Iran ist dies eine Straftat, das Gesetz sieht mindestens 100 Peitschenhiebe vor.

So beginnt für Menschen wie Kaveh und Leila die wichtigste Herausforderung erst nach dem Einzug in die gemeinsame Wohnung: Der Kampf um Diskretion. Zwar gibt es in Iran keine Meldepflicht bei Behörden. Aber es kommt vor, dass konservative Nachbarn die Polizei alarmieren.

Vollständiger Artikel


Einsortiert unter:Civil Rights Tagged: Heirat, Iran, weiße Heirat

Eye on Iran: Iran Blocks Inspections, Hobbling Nuclear Deal

$
0
0

WSJ: “Iran’s government continues to stonewall United Nations weapons inspectors, complicating the Obama administration’s effort to forge a nuclear agreement with Tehran by a late-November deadline, according to U.S. and U.N. officials. The U.S. and the European Union have said Iran’s cooperation with the U.N. in addressing evidence that Tehran conducted studies in the past on the development of atomic weapons is crucial to reaching a broader accord on the future of the Iranian nuclear program. But Yukiya Amano, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N.’s nuclear watchdog, said Friday there has been almost no progress in resolving the outstanding allegations of weapons development, despite a year of negotiations with Iranian President Hasan Rouhani ‘s government… ‘What is needed now is concrete action,’ Mr. Amano said during a speech in Washington. ‘Progress is limited.'”http://t.uani.com/1wXkUSR

Guardian: “A British-Iranian woman detained in Iran for trying to watch a volleyball game has been sentenced to one year in a notorious prison, according to her family and lawyer. Ghoncheh Ghavami, 25, a law graduate from London, was found guilty of spreading ‘propaganda against the regime’ following a secret hearing at Tehran’s revolutionary court. Ghavami has been detained for 127 days in prison since being arrested on 20 June at Azadi (‘Freedom’ in Farsi) stadium in Tehran where Iran’s national volleyball team was scheduled to play Italy. Although she had been released within a few hours after the initial arrest she was rearrested days later. Speaking to the Guardian, Ghavami’s brother Iman, 28, said the family felt ‘shattered’ by the court verdict. ‘We are really disappointed because we felt she would get out on bail immediately. She’s been through a lot and now it’s a full-year sentence and she’s already served four months,’ he said.”http://t.uani.com/1wYlduZ

AFP: “Global powers wrestling to hammer out a ground-breaking deal with Iran to curb its nuclear ambitions are moving complex talks into high gear with a ‘critical’ three weeks left for an accord. The main players — US Secretary of State John Kerry, his Iranian counterpart Mohammad Javad Zarif and outgoing EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton — will crisscross the globe ahead of the November 24 deadline seeking to narrow the gaps. Ashton will first meet in Vienna on November 7 with political directors from the so-called P5+1 grouping — Britain, China, France, Russia and the United States as well as Germany — her spokesman Michael Mann said. She will then fly to Oman to meet with Kerry and Zarif in closed meetings, in the country that first hosted secret talks between old foes Iran and the United States… ‘We have critical weeks ahead of us,’ Kerry told PBS television. ‘The stakes for the world are enormous. I hope the Iranians will not get stuck in a tree of their own making, on one demand or another, in order to try to find a way together. I’m hopeful, but it’s a very tough negotiation.'” http://t.uani.com/1x1benK

Nuclear Program & Negotiations

Bloomberg: “Iran will meet with the U.S. and other world powers next week in Oman in advance of a Nov. 24 deadline for a deal that would curtail Tehran’s nuclear program. Iran will hold talks with the group known as the P5+1 nations — the U.S., U.K., Russia, China, France and Germany — in Oman’s capital, Muscat, on Nov. 11, State Department spokeswoman Marie Harf said in a statement today. That meeting will follow two days of talks that Secretary of State John Kerry plans to hold in Muscat with Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and Catherine Ashton, who represents the European Union in the talks.” http://t.uani.com/1xSr5nS

Al-Monitor: “Yukiya Amano, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told Al-Monitor Oct. 31 that Iran’s halting cooperation so far in explaining possible military-related nuclear work would not derail ongoing negotiations on a long-term nonproliferation agreement. ‘It should not be an impediment,’ Amano said after the conclusion of remarks at the Brookings Institution in Washington… Many experts doubt that a deal can be concluded next month but suggest that the major elements of an agreement could be reached. ‘I see no possibility of achieving a comprehensive deal by Nov. 24,’ Robert Einhorn, a former senior nuclear expert with both the Obama and Clinton administrations who hosted the event with Amano, told Al-Monitor. ‘The best that can be achieved is to reach agreement on the key parameters of a deal and to take several more months to flesh out the parameters.'” http://t.uani.com/1t6XyCB

Sanctions Relief

Fars (Iran): “Secretary of Iran’s Second International Auto Exhibition Sasan Qorbani announced that the number of international foreign companies that will take part in the exhibition has considerably increased. ‘A sum of 55 foreign automakers and part-makers will take part in the exhibition,’ Qorbani said on Sunday. He noted that the number of foreign guests participating in the event has also increased to 190, and said, ‘All European and Asian carmakers will take part in Iran’s auto expo.’ Last week, Qorbani announced that Benz, Volkswagen, Volvo, Fiat, Rover, Skoda, Renault, Peugeot, Kia and Toyota would take part in the Iranian auto expo, adding that the US car-manufacturers would also join the event. ‘In case of desirable conditions, General Motors and Ford companies will also attend the event.’ He continued that some leading car parts makers, including Siemens, FORD Mendo, Busch, FRW and ACI would attend the gathering. The event will start work on December 10.” http://t.uani.com/13zqnD7

AFP: “For Iran — whose currency, the rial, has been severely depressed by rampant inflation — tourism offers a foreign exchange windfall… People are coming back. Official figures show that at the end of March, tourist numbers were up 35 percent year-on-year to 4.5 million, bringing in $6 billion… However, a nuclear deal remains a hope rather than a given and tour operators know optimism can vanish quickly. For the moment, local guides are filling their pockets. ‘This is a new wave. We have between 300 percent and 400 percent more visitors,’ says Mohsen Hajisaeid, who was looking after a group from Hong Kong.” http://t.uani.com/1x1a1gf

Fars (Iran): “Iran’s largest carmaker, Iran Khodro Company (IKCO), has signed a 4-year contract with a German auto designer, the company’s president announced on Sunday, adding that a foreign team has also been hired for designing two new car platforms for the company. ‘We have endorsed a 4-year contract with this designer and he is due to design two new platforms in the next four years,’ IKCO President Hashem Yekeh Zareh told FNA. ‘Accordingly, it was decided that a 10-member team visit Iran along with the German designer in the next one to two months to plan for designing two new car platforms.’ Noting that the German designer has been employed by Iran Khodro at least for four years, Yekeh Zareh said that other members of the team are also due to sign a 1 to 4-year contracts with IKCO.” http://t.uani.com/10eZfqH

Sanctions Enforcement & Impact

Reuters: “U.S. authorities are investigating London-based Standard Chartered Plc for potential U.S. sanctions violations connected to its banking for Iranian-controlled entities in Dubai, according to people familiar with the probe. The latest investigation involving the bank is based, in part, from evidence that emerged during a separate probe of BNP Paribas, the French bank that pleaded guilty this summer to charges related to sanctions-busting and agreed to pay $8.9 billion in penalties, the people said. During the course of the BNP case, U.S. federal and state investigators received evidence the French bank had done business with a Dubai-registered corporation that was a front for an Iranian entity, one source said. Investigators also learned that the company used to have an account with Standard Chartered, according to the source. Such an account would have been covered by U.S. sanctions laws that ban dealings with Iran because activity in the account involved U.S. dollar transactions… Standard Chartered in 2012 paid $667 million to U.S. authorities and entered into deferred prosecution agreements with the Manhattan District Attorney and U.S. Department of Justice over violations stemming from Iran and other sanctioned countries.” http://t.uani.com/1DRz32G

Human Rights

NYT: “A senior Iranian emissary hinted on Friday that Iranian authorities might be prepared to free a Washington Post correspondent who has been inexplicably imprisoned and kept virtually incommunicado since July 22. The emissary, Mohammad Javad Larijani, who was attending a United Nations Human Rights Council session, said that security service officials had prepared charges against the correspondent, Jason Rezaian, for activities ‘entering the area of the security of the state.’ But he added that he hoped the charges would be dropped during court proceedings that he expected to start ‘soon.’ Mr. Larijani, a member of a politically powerful Iranian family and secretary general of Iran’s High Council for Human Rights, declined to elaborate on the charges. Nor did he further specify the status of Mr. Rezaian’s case in the opaque Iranian judicial process. Mr. Rezaian has not been able to hire a lawyer because no charges have been formally made.” http://t.uani.com/10jf4Nh

Press TV (Iran): “The secretary of Iran’s High Council for Human Rights says the propaganda campaign launched by Western media is to blame for the recent execution of a convicted Iranian woman. The Iranian government sought ‘to solicit forgiveness from the [victim's] first-degree families. Unfortunately, the campaign which was launched by Western media and politicians definitely’ ruined the atmosphere of soliciting forgiveness, Larijani said in an interview with CNN. He made the remarks on the sidelines of the 20th session of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) Working Group in Geneva, Switzerland.”http://t.uani.com/1t6XItI

Domestic Politics

RFE/RL: “Promoting virtue and preventing vice proved to be the death of Ali Khalili, a young Iranian seminary student who eventually succumbed to injuries sustained when he tried to stop a group of men from harassing and kidnapping two women. Now lawmakers are debating ways to protect citizens like Khalili who take it upon themselves to defend the values of the Islamic republic. But by giving citizens legal license to take Islamic law into their own hands, critics warn, Tehran could be institutionalizing violent acts such as the recent spate of acid attacks targeting women — apparently because they were deemed to be in violation of Iran’s strict Islamic dress code. The bill winding through the conservative-dominated parliament would strengthen punishments for those who injure or kill people carrying out their Islamic duty to promote virtue and prevent vice, and would give injured vigilantes of Islamic justice the same benefits and legal protections afforded to ‘martyrs and disabled veterans.'” http://t.uani.com/1zrSykz

Foreign Affairs

Bloomberg: “After forcing concessions from Yemen’s government last month, Shiite Muslim rebels ignored pleas to pull out of the capital, flaunting an ascendancy that has alarmed the country’s Gulf Arab neighbors. The Houthi fighters, with scimitars hanging from their waists, now guard key ministries and the central bank in Sana’a. Outside the capital, they have fought their way into Yemen’s second-largest port on the Red Sea and seized a crossing post on the Saudi border. For Saudi Arabia, it’s the perception of an Iranian hand that makes the advance a threat. The Houthis, who follow a branch of Shiite Islam called Zaidi, have pushed aside a government installed three years ago as part of a peace plan backed by the Saudis and their Sunni allies. Yemen, which shares a 1,100-mile border with the world’s biggest oil supplier, threatens to become another arena for the Saudi-Iranian antagonism that underlies many of the region’s crises… In Yemen, Houthi gains will weaken Saudi Arabia’s influence over the impoverished country led by Gulf Cooperation Council-backed President Abdurabu Mansur Hadi. ‘What is happening in Yemen should worry Saudi Arabia,’ Faris al-Saqqaf, an adviser to President Hadi, said in a phone interview on Oct. 17. ‘Iranian ambition will not stop at Yemen.'”http://t.uani.com/1s7ST4a

Opinion & Analysis

Ray Takeyh in WashPost: “As the Nov. 24 deadline for Iran and the great powers to negotiate a comprehensive nuclear agreement approaches, both sides may be confronted with momentous choices. What happens if the decade-long search for an arms-control accord falters? Although there is little evidence that the West is contemplating alternative strategies, important actors in Iran are beginning to consider life after diplomatic failure. Since the exposure of its illicit nuclear program in 2002, the Islamic republic has wrestled with a contradictory mandate: how to expand its nuclear infrastructure while sustaining a measure of economic growth. The reformist president Mohammad Khatami avoided debilitating economic sanctions by suspending nuclear activities. Then came the tumultuous presidency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, which privileged nuclear empowerment over economic vitality. Current president Hassan Rouhani has succeeded in negotiating an interim agreement – the Joint Plan of Action – but he faces diminishing prospects for a final accord. Iran has finally come to the crossroads, and Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and many hard-line elements seem ready to forge ahead with their nuclear ambitions even if they collide with economic imperatives. During the past few years, Khamenei has been pressing his concept of a resistance economy whereby Iran would shed its need for foreign contracts and commerce. ‘Instead of reliance on the oil revenues, Iran should be managed through reliance on its internal forces and the resources on the ground,’ he said last month. Writing in the conservative daily Khorasan last year, commentator Mehdi Hasanzadeh went further: ‘An economy that relies on domestic [production] rather than preliminary agreement or the lifting of a small part of sanctions or even all sanctions will bring a great economic victory.’ In the impractical universe of conservatives, Iran can meet the basic needs of its people by developing local industries. Iran’s reactionaries seem to prefer national poverty to nuclear disarmament. The notions of self-sufficiency and self-reliance have long been hallmarks of conservative thinking in Iran. Since the 1980s, a central tenet of the hard-liners’ foreign policy perspective has been that Iran’s revolution is a remarkable historical achievement that the United States can’t accept or accommodate. Western powers will always conspire against an Islamic state that they cannot control, this thinking goes, and the only way Iran can secure its independence and achieve its national objectives is to lessen its reliance on its principal export commodity. Hard-liners believe that isolation from the international community can best preserve Iran’s ideological identity. This siege mentality drives Iran’s quest for nuclear arms and their deterrent power.” http://t.uani.com/1tusbFy


Einsortiert unter:Atomprogramm, Ayatollah Khomeini, Iran Tagged: Iran

Iranische Cyber-Attacke auf deutsche Unternehmen Bayerischer Verfassungsschutz deckt Komplott auf

$
0
0

Der bayerische Verfassungsschutz hat einen iranischen Hacker-Angriff auf zahlreiche deutsche und internationale Unternehmen und Forschungseinrichtungen aufgedeckt. Dies berichtet das Hamburger Wirtschaftsmagazin BILANZ in seiner am Freitag erscheinenden Ausgabe. Ausgespäht wurden Rüstungsfabriken, Luft-, Raumfahrt- und Chemieunternehmen sowie Universitäten. Erhebliche Datenmengen wurden gestohlen. Der Angriff, der spätestens Anfang 2013 begann und immer noch läuft, besäße, laut dem bayerischen Verfassungsschutz, eine “große Dimension”.

Die Angreifer interessierten sich unter anderem für den Bau von Raketen, Hubschraubern, Satelliten und Drohnen. Einem Luft- und Raumfahrtkonzern kamen 115.000 Dateien abhanden, ein Satelliten-Hersteller verlor 10.000 Dateien. Ziel der Attacken waren Firmen und Einrichtungen aus Deutschland, anderen EU-Ländern, den USA, Mexiko, Israel, Russland und China. Bei deutschen Firmen seien laut Verfassungsschutz bislang keine Daten abgeflossen, teilte der Verfassungsschutz mit. Weitere deutsche und internationale Nachrichtendienste sind in die Ermittlungen einbezogen.

Die Fahnder waren auf einen Server gestoßen, auf dem erbeutete Dateien von Opfern sowie Werkzeuge der Angreifer abgelegt waren. Von dort aus arbeiteten sie sich durch das Netz der Hacker vor, ermittelten weitere Opfer und schließlich auch die IP-Adressen und Tarnfirmen der Täter: Die Spur endete im Iran. Man stellte auch fest, dass die Attacken meist zu iranischen Bürozeiten erfolgten. Die Hacker hatten Passwörter entschlüsselt, Zugangsdaten über gefälschte Emails abgegriffen und Lücken im Betriebssystem Windows genutzt.

Quelle:

Redaktion Bilanz

Einsortiert unter:Cyberwar, Deutschland, Europa, Iran, Spionage Tagged: Cyberwar, Deutschland, Iran, Rüstungsindustrie, Spionage

Islamic State Invokes Prophecy to Justify Its Claim to Caliphate

$
0
0
A militant Islamist fighter uses a mobile to film his fellow fighters taking part in a military parade along the streets of Syria's northern Raqqa province (REUTERS/Stringer). At an Islamic State checkpoint on the southern outskirts of Kirkuk stands a billboard proclaiming, “The Islamic State: A Caliphate in Accordance with the Prophetic Method.” Search Twitter for the phrase in Arabic and you will see it’s popular with the jihadist set, who quote and swap pictures of it incessantly. (In one such picture, a little boy holds the slogan above his head.)

The Islamic State’s spokesman, Abu Muhammad al-Adnani, is also fond of the phrase. Just months before the Islamic State’s declaration of the caliphate, Adnani invoked it to rebut al-Qaeda’s claim that the Islamic State had become too extreme: “A state of Islam rules by your Book and the tradition of your Prophet and fights your enemies. So reinforce it, honor it, aid it, and establish it in the land. Make it a caliphate in accordance with the prophetic method.”[1]

The phrase comes from a prophecy attributed to the Prophet Muhammad, who explains how religious authority will become increasingly secular and abusive after his death until the caliphate is restored.

“Prophethood will be among you as long as God intends, and then God will take it away if He so wills. Then there will be a caliphate according to the prophetic method. It will be among you as long as God intends, and then God will take it away if He so wills. Then there will be a mordacious monarchy. It will be among you as long as God intends, and then God will take it away if He so wills. Then there will be a tyrannical monarchy. It will be among you as long as God intends, and then God will take it away if He so wills. Then there will be a caliphate in accordance with the prophetic method.”

When the Islamic State declared a caliphate in June, Adnani reminded the world of the prophecy uttered “by the tongue of the prophet,” proclaiming “nothing remains after the elimination of these borders, the borders of humiliation, and the breaking of the idol, the idol of nationalism, except the caliphate in accordance with the prophetic method.” Signage and stationary further reinforce the claim that the Islamic State’s nightmarish bureaucracy fulfills Muhammad’s prophecy. An Islamic State soldier in Iraq’s Nineveh province wears a patchemblazoned with the slogan, and official Islamic State letterhead includes the words.

According to the story of the prophecy, Muhammad fell silent after he predicted the restoration of the caliphate. Many Sunni jihadists and other apocalypticists have interpreted the Prophet’s silence to mean the caliphate will be restored at the end of time. Among them was al-Qaeda firebrand Anwar al-Awlaki, who believed Muslims would reestablish the caliphate in accordance with the prophetic method after they had finally vanquished the infidels. Awlaki theorized that the “massive air power invented by humanity today” would annihilate any caliphate established before this final victory. The Islamic State is testing that theory today.


[1] Abu Muhammad al-`Adnani, “Ma kana hadha manhajuna wa-lan yakun,” 17 April 2014.

Source: Iran@Brookings


Einsortiert unter:Iran, ISIS Tagged: Iran, ISIS

Is Ahmadinejad making a comeback?

$
0
0

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (C) meets with Iraqi Vice President Khudair al-Khuzaie (not seen) during a visit in Baghdad when Ahmadinejad was still president of Iran, July 18, 2013. (photo by REUTERS/Hadi Mizban)

A three-story building in a quiet one-way alley in northern Tehran is the headquarters of an unlikely campaign that opposes both the administration of President Hassan Rouhani and many of the Islamic Republic’s establishment figures.

The Velenjak building is the base of activities for former President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who has his offices on its third floor.

Ahmadinejad has been relatively quiet since the ascendance of the moderate Rouhani, but the Iranian Labor News Agency (ILNA) is only one ofmany outlets that have reported on his desire to make a comeback.

According to Amir Mohebbian, a leading political analyst, Ahmadinejad’s attempt to return to poweris obvious as he “quietly awaits favorable conditions and occasionally tests the waters.”

The provincial trips that the former hard-line president makes are one indication.

In addition to making many trips to southern and northern Iran, Ahmadinejad celebrated the end of Ramadan by visiting Taleqan with the family members of four celebrated Iran-Iraq war “martyrs” in a trip that, according to ILNA, was coordinated by the Quds Force, the formidable international arm of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps.

In April, Ahmadinejad ruled out a return to politics but many of his supporters beg to differ.

They are tirelessly organizing and insist on his return. These are an unlikely bunch. Their young cadre runsmany blogs and social media accounts. They draw controversy by their occasionally unconventional mixing of Islamism with an anti-wealthy and anti-establishment discourse, and many have spent time in jail for their activities. Their targets are not only the Reformists but many of the traditional conservatives.

Take Ahmad Shariat, who heads the Internet committee of an Ahmadinejad organization. In his blog, he attacked the policy of backing Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, called for a boycott of the last Majles elections in 2012 (because many Ahmadinejad forces were barred), attacked establishment religious figures such as Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi and, finally, dared to criticize Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei himself (the latter, in early 2013, led to the closing of Shariat’s blog and his arrest).

These supporters leave no doubt as to their allegiance to the ex-president. One name they go by is “Homa,” a Persian acronym for “Supporters of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.” An online newspaper with the same name (Homa Daily) opened last week on the occasion of Ahmadinejad’s 58th birthday. (“Square 72″ is another outlet, named after Ahmadinejad’s neighborhood in northeastern Tehran).

Abdolreza Davari — who was a vice-president of IRNA, the national news agency for the administration under Ahmadinejad — is a leading organizer of Homa. A controversial figure who was fired from a teaching post for “political activities,” Davari was reported by ILNA as one of the top three media campaigners attempting an Ahmadinejad comeback.

“As an Iranian, I hope for the return of Mr. Ahmadinejad to politics,” Davari told Al-Monitor, before adding that he thinks the ex-president is currently focused on “scientific” activities.

To my question about the regular meetings of Homa in the Velenjak building, Davari says that such meetings are not organized but that “all kinds of people, commentators, students or ordinary people come to meet and talk to Dr. Ahmadinejad.”

Davari also denies that Homa is attempting to organize for next year’s Majles elections. Ahmadinejad’s return to power needs no less than “changes in the current relation of forces,” Davari says, seeming to imply that many of the establishment figures wouldn’t want the ex-president back. Many such figures are especially opposed to Ahmadinejad’s entourage.

Enter Esfandiar Rahim Mashaei, Ahmadinejad’s chief of staff, who was openly rebuked by Khamenei for his maverick mixing of Shiite millennialism, Persian nationalism and leftist language. Despite Khamenei’s personal rejection and the sustained attacks of many who accused Mashaei of leading a “deviationist current,” the ex-president has continued backing his close friend (whose daughter married Ahmadinejad’s eldest son) even after the Guardian Council rejected Mashaei’s candidacy in last year’s presidential elections.

Mashaei’s offices are on the second level of the Velenjak building, and he is known to take part in Homa meetings.

Homa Daily ran Mashaei’s picture in the first page of its first issue, while reprinting his most controversial interview, where he had defended the necessity of “friendship with the Israeli people” — an interview personally criticized and attacked by Khamenei.

Davari says Mashaei doesn’t want to return to politics due to his “cultural and spiritual sentiment.” Taking a note from Mashaei’s book, he says Ahmadinejad’s concept of the Islamic Revolution and his belief in the coming of the hidden Imam is not “meant for a specific geography or religion as the hidden Imam’s global message is aimed at all nations and groups.”

“Freedom-loving and justice-seeking fighters” like Fidel Castro, Che Guevara, Djamila Boupacha, Bobby Sands, Hassan Nasrallah and Hugo Chavez belong to the same global front as Ahmadinejad, Davari insists.

Acolytes of Mashaei seem to have especially targeted Iran’s nuclear negotiations. A group called the “the National Movement for Iran’s Independence” (NAMA, for its Persian acronym) was formed with the declared goal of fighting any compromise with the West. Its unusual name (not mentioning Islam) has the Mashaie imprint.

Mashaei’s presence has always driven away many of Ahmadinejad’s backers. One of them is Mohammadreza Etemadian, a trade adviser to the ex-president. Etemadian told Al-Monitor that he would like to see Ahmadinejad back, but he has always told him to keep Mashaei away since “he is not on good terms with the supreme leader and is a deviant.”

Etemadian is a leading member of the Islamic Coalition Party, the traditional organization of Bazari Islamists and an important part of the establishment. Its leaders seem to detest the populist excesses of Ahmadinejad.

Sensing this, the ever-adventurous Ahmadinejad has been trying to find new allies, even if among the Reformists. He met with Hassan Khomeini, the 40-year-old grandson of the founder of the Islamic Republic, known for his proximity to the Reformists. The ex-president boldly asked Khomeini to lead a group of young clerics to contest the next year’s election of the Assembly of Experts, the body that chooses the supreme leader.

He has also reportedly tried to meet the Reformist ex-President Mohammad Khatami and Ambassador Sadeq Kharazi, an influential diplomat from a key political family.

Meanwhile, it was reported that Gholam-Hossein Elham, the spokesman of Ahmadinejad’s government, has started campaigning for the ex-president and last week met with the governors-generals of the previous government to organize. Elham, however, spoke with the pro-Ahmadinejad “Square 72” website to deny this news.

Unceremoniously bowing out after the disqualification of the candidate he supported in the 2013 presidential elections, Ahmadinejad seems to be busy plotting a comeback.

Source: AL-Monitor


Einsortiert unter:Ahmadinejad, Ali Khamenei Tagged: Ahmadinejad, Iran

Timeline: Tensions between Iran and the United States

$
0
0

Relations between the US and Iran following the 1979 Iranian revolution have been fractured at best – but can be seen as a series of highs and lows. Here is a timeline of tensions between Tehran and Washington

An Iranian woman stands in front of the painted wall of the former US embassy in Tehran
An Iranian woman stands in front of the painted wall of the former US embassy in Tehran Photo: ATTA KENARE/AFP

From the shooting down of an Iranian commercial airline to the development of Iran’s nuclear program, below is a timeline of the historical moment’s post 1979 that have formed the present-day relationship.

January 1979: Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlevi flees Iran

The US-backed Shah of Iran, Mohammed Reza Pahlevi, is forced to leave the country on 16 January following months of demonstrations against his rule by secular and religious opponents. Two weeks later, Islamic religious leader Ayatollah Khomeini, who referred to America as the “Great Satan”, returns from exile.

April 1979: Islamic Republic of Iran formed

Following a referendum, the Islamic Republic of Iran is proclaimed.

November 1979: The Iran hostage crisis:

Angered by the Carter administration allowing the recently deposed Shah into the United States, the revolutionary group Muslim Student Followers of the Imam’s Line occupied the American embassy in Tehran and took 52 American diplomats hostage for 444 days. On April 24, 1980, a failed rescue – Operation Eagle Claw – resulted in the deaths of eight American servicemen and one Iranian civilian.

The crisis ended with the signing of the Algiers Accords in Algeria on January 19, 1981.

April 1980: The end of diplomatic relations

The United States end diplomatic relations with Iran, a break which has yet to be restored.

1983: Hizbollah bombings

United States implicates Hizbollah, an Iranian movement formed at the time of the Iranian Revolution, in terrorist attacks against the US. Attacks included the United States embassy bombing in Beirut, Lebanon, that killed 17 Americans, and the Beirut barracks bombing which killed 241 US peace keepers.

1986: Exchange of weapons

The US provided weapons to Iran, reportedly to fund anti-communist Contras militants in Nicaragua to help free US hostages held by Hizbollah in Lebanon. Reagan administration confirmed that weapons had been transferred to Iran but denied they were part of an exchange for hostages.

1988: Iranian Airbus shot down

US Navy guided missile cruiser USS Vincennes shot down commercial airline Iranian Airbus A300B2, killing 290 civilians from six nations, including 66 children. The US says the Airbus A300 was mistaken for a fighter jet that was outside the civilian air corridor and was not responding to radio calls.

April 1995: Clinton administration embargo

A total embargo on dealings with Iran by American companies was imposed by Bill Clinton.

January 1998: Mohammed Khatami elected

Newly elected Iranian President Mohammad Khatami called for a “dialogue of civilisations” with the United States in a CNN interview based on similarities between American and Iranian quests for freedom

January 2002: “Axis of Evil”

President George W Bush gave his infamous speech describing Iran, along with North Korea and Iraq, as an “Axis of evil”.

The president warned that the proliferation of long-range missiles developed by these countries constituted terrorism and threatened the United States.

2002: Uranium development

Iranian opposition group reveals that Iran is developing nuclear facilities including a uranium enrichment plant at Natanz and a heavy water reactor at Arak. The US accuses Iran of a clandestine nuclear weapons programme, which Iran denies.

June 2005: Tensions over atomic energy

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice suggests that the head of International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Mohamed ElBaradei, should either “toughen his stance on Iran” or not be chosen for a third term.

August 2005: Ahmadinejad becomes president

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad voted to become Iran’s president

2006: NGO

United States passed the Iran Freedom and Support Act, which appropriated millions of dollars for human rights Non-governmental organisations working in Iran.

May 2006: Ahmadinejad reaches out to President Bush

Ahmadinejad sent a personal letter to President Bush to propose “new ways” to end Iran’s nuclear dispute. Both Condoleezza Rice and National Security Adviser Stephen Hadley dismissed it as a negotiating ploy and publicity stunt that did not address American concerns about Iran’s nuclear program.

August 2006: UN debate invite turned down

Ahmadinejad invite to President Bush to a debate at the UN General Assembly was rejected by the White House.

September 2006: Financial sanctions

US government imposed sanctions on Bank Saderat Iran barring it from direct or indirect dealings with American financial institutions due to its reported connections with Hizbollah. Further sanctions on the financial sector were imposed by the US and EU in 2012 over Iran’s nuclear development.

May 2007: Iranian diplomat “ready to talk”

Iran’s top diplomat Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki stated that Iran is “ready to talk” to the United States.

November 2007: Iranian diplomats released

American armed forces released two Iranian diplomats as well as seven other Iranian citizens after 305 days captured in the raid of the Iranian Consulate General located in Erbil, Iraq.

April 2008: Ahmadinejad 9/11 comments

Ahmadinejad described the September 11 attacks as a “suspect event”, saying that all that happened was that “a building collapsed”.

November 2008: Barack Obama elected president

Ahmadinejad issued the first congratulatory message to a newly elected American president since 1979: “Iran welcomes basic and fair changes in U.S. policies and conducts. I hope you will prefer real public interests and justice to the never-ending demands of a selfish minority and seize the opportunity to serve people so that you will be remembered with high esteem”.

2010: Walk out at UN speech

During a 2010 speech to the UN, Ahmadinejad sparks walkouts after he claims that most people believe the US government were behind the 9/11 attacks.

2013: First phone call between US and Iranian heads of state for 30 years

Iran’s new President, Hassan Rouhani, held a phone call with President Barack Obama on a trip to the UN forum in New York – the first conversation between US and Iranian heads of state for 30 years. The US president said they both had expressed their determination to solve the long-running dispute over Iran’s nuclear programme.

November 2014: President Obama sends ‘secret letter’ to leader of Iran

US President Barack Obama is said to have written a secret letter to Iran’s supreme leader describing a shared interest in fighting IS. The president also urged Ayatollah Ali Khamenei towards a nuclear agreement. It is the fourth time President Obama has written to the Iranian leader since taking office in 2009.

Source: Telegraph/AP/Reuter


Einsortiert unter:Iran, USA Tagged: Iran, USA

Going against Netanyahu, 84 percent of US Jews favor Iran nuclear deal

$
0
0

Strong Jewish support for an Iran nuclear deal was a surprise finding of a poll of American Jews who voted Tuesday. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has warned against any deal that leaves Iran with an enrichment program.

By Howard LaFranchi

  • Jacquelyn Martin/AP
    View Caption

As President Obama presses to reach an accord with Iranon its nuclear program by the end of the month, he can count on strong support from what might seem like an unlikely segment of the population: American Jews.

Jewish backing of the administration’s efforts to strike a deal suggests that American Jews aren’t heeding the alarms being sounded in Israel by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. He warns that any deal that leaves Iran with an enrichment program constitutes a mortal danger to Israel.

Strong Jewish support for a nuclear deal that limits, but doesn’t completely stop, Iran’s uranium enrichment abilities was a surprise finding of a telephone poll of Jewish voters who took part in Tuesday’s midterm elections. The poll, commissioned by J Street – the self-described “pro-Israel, pro-peace” Washington lobbying organization – also found strong support for an active US role in efforts to forge Arab-Israeli peace. At the same time, the survey found strong support for Israel’s handling of Operation Protective Edge, this summer’s military operation against Hamas in Gaza that resulted in strong international criticism of Israel over the heavy civilian toll.

Recommended: How much do you know about Iran? Take our quiz to find out.

But it was the findings on Iran and the implication that American Jews would be comfortable with Iran retaining a nuclear program that stood out.

The survey found that 84 percent of American Jews would favor either strongly or somewhat a deal with Iran that would alleviate tough sanctions on the Iranian economy in exchange for Iran’s agreement to limit its nuclear program to civilian purposes and accept inspectors at its nuclear facilities.

The United States and five other world powers face a Nov. 24 deadline for reaching a deal with Iran. Mr. Obama said Wednesday that the nations in talks with Iran have presented Tehran with a “framework” that would “allow them to meet their peaceful energy needs,” but he said he wasn’t sure if a deal could be reached by the approaching deadline.

The strong Jewish backing for a deal actually mirrors the level of support for a diplomatic solution with Iran among Americans in general, say political analysts at J Street.

“The American public generally is supportive of giving diplomacy time to work,” says Dylan Williams, J Street director of government affairs. “I don’t think Jewish Americans are different from where the general American population is on this.”

American Jews “have accepted that some level of uranium enrichment will be part of a viable deal,” Mr. Williams says. Now, he adds, the key to acceptance of a deal – by Jews and the general public alike – will be “a robust verification and monitoring regime” that blocks Iran’s path to a nuclear weapon.

The survey registered a strong sense of connection to Mr. Netanyahu among American Jews, even though its results suggest they don’t support his policies. Asked to gauge on a scale of 1 to 100 their feelings of warmth toward various leaders and personalities, respondents gave Netanyahu a 61 – higher than Obama (49) and Hillary Rodham Clinton (57).

“The prime minister is personally popular with American Jews,” says Jessica Rosenblum, J Street communications director. “The difference here is that they have deep concerns about the policies he’s pursuing.”

The survey also found that American Jews continue to support by a wide margin Democrats over Republicans. This is despite repeated predictions over recent years from conservative Jewish pundits that US Jews – because of Obama’s push for an Israeli-Palestinian two-state settlement, his overtures to Iran, and his frosty relations with Netanyahu – are on the verge of a wholesale shift to the Republican column.

“It’s comical how every two years the small segment of our community that leans conservative says, ‘This is the year that Jewish-Americans will vote for more hawkish politicians and policies,’ and it never happens,” Williams says.

In Tuesday’s elections, American Jews voted for Democrats over Republicans by a decisive margin of 69 to 28 percent.

And on that “feelings of warmth” gauge, they gave the Democratic Party a 51. The Republican Party got a 28.

http://launch.newsinc.com/share.html?trackingGroup=90962&siteSection=csmonitor_nws_pol_sty_vmpp&videoId=28114690

Source: The Christian Science Monitor


Einsortiert unter:5+1 Gruppe, Ali Khamenei, Atomprogramm, Betanyahu, Israel, Obama Tagged: 5plus1, Aktionen, Atom Crisis, Atombombe, Barack Obama, Chamenei, Iran, Israel, USA

Freitag| Wo steht der Iran heute?

$
0
0

Marktliberalisierung Ein nicht ganz neuer neoliberaler Kurs verändert den Iran und seine Beziehung zum Westen. Eine gute Entwicklung? Interview mit dem Exiljournalisten Soheil Asefi. (Auszug)

Ein Nutzerbeitrag von Sönke Paulsen

Der in Berlin lebende Soheil Asefi ist unabhängiger Journalist und Analytiker in Fragen des Irans und des Nahen Ostens. Asefi wurde  in Teheran geboren und begann sehr früh mit dem Schreiben von Artikeln. Er arbeitete für eine Vielzahl von Medien und Publikationen und schrieb Kolumnen über Politik und Geschichte, sowohl für Printmedien als auch online. 2007 wurde er verhaftet und verbrachte drei Monate im Gefängnis Evin in Teheran, die meiste Zeit seiner Inhaftierung verbrachte er in Einzelhaft im berüchtigten Trakt 209. Er kam gegen Kaution frei und verließ vor einigen Jahren den Iran – nachdem er zehn Jahre für große iranische Medien gearbeitet hatte. Unter dem Schutz des Writers in Exile-Programms des PEN-Zentrums Deutschland kam er als Gast der Stadt Nürnberg nach Deutschland.  Soheil Asefi ist Preisträger des Hermann-Kasten-Preises der Stadt Nürnberg. Seine Artikel erschienen in Publikationen wie „Monthly Review”, „Counterpunch” und „Media with Conscience‘. Zudem ist er Redaktionsmitglied von  Journalists in Exile (JIE), einem von Reporter ohne Grenzen betriebenen Blog. (He can be reached onTwitter.)

Das Interview wurde von Sönke Paulsen (Berlin) geführt.

Soheil, Sie haben viel über die neoliberale Wirtschaftspolitik des Irans in den letzten Jahren geschrieben. Dennoch haben religiöse Stiftungen, die Bonyads, immer noch die Kontrolle über 80% der iranischen Wirtschaft. Wie stehen sie zu einer neuen Phase wirtschaftlicher Privatisierung und welche Interessenslagen sehen Sie, die sich gegen diesen Kurs der Marktliberalisierung richten?

S.A:Ich möchte die Frage etwas erweitern, denn die Bonyads werden zu einem großen Teil von Mitgliedern und ehemaligen Mitgliedern der Iranischen Revolutionsgarden beherrscht. Die IRGC (Army of the Guardians of the Islamic Revolution) wurde 1979 gegründet. Es waren schiitische Militärs, die, loyal gegenüber Khomeni , gewissermaßen zu Prätorianern des klerikalen Regimes wurden und dieses gegen die Opposition schützte und auch gegen das traditionelle iranische Militär, das eine Bedrohung für das Regime darstellte.

Verstehe, aber wie bekamen die Revolutionsgarden diese ökonomische Macht?

S.A:Man kann es einfach ausdrücken. Nachdem sie im Krieg gegen den Irak in die iranische Armee integriert wurden, kamen sie schnell in eine Führungsrolle und kontrollierten überdies zunehmend die Geheimdienste, waren zuständig für den Grenzschutz und somit auch in der Lage, die internationalen Warenströme und Kapitalflüsse zu kontrollieren. Es gab schlicht niemanden, der sie begrenzte oder anders ausgedrückt, sie hatten im klerikalen Iran keine Konkurrenz. In den neunziger Jahren kontrollierten sie sogar den Schwarzmarkt, einschließlich des verbotenen Alkoholhandels.

Die Garden kontrollieren weiterhin militärische Schlüsselpositionen, was bis zum Raketenprogramm und dem Atomprogramm des Iran geht. Als dann die Privatisierung von strategisch wichtigen Unternehmen, beispielsweise Öl-Firmen, politisch beschlossen wurde, war klar, dass damit keine Internationalisierung gemeint war. Die Unternehmen gingen an die gesellschaftliche Gruppe, die einerseits loyal gegenüber dem Klerus war und andererseits über die nötige wirtschaftliche Kompetenz verfügte, und das waren die Garden!

Vollständiger Artikel


Einsortiert unter:Bonyads, Iran 2014, Iranischen Revolutionsgarden, Pasdaran, Wirtschaft Tagged: Bonyads, Iran, Iranischen Revolutionsgarden, Wirtschaft

BBC| The gay people pushed to change their gender

$
0
0

Donya

Iran is one of a handful of countries where homosexual acts are punishable by death. Clerics do, however accept the idea that a person may be trapped in a body of the wrong sex. So homosexuals can be pushed into having gender reassignment surgery – and to avoid it many flee the country.

Growing up in Iran, Donya kept her hair shaved or short, and wore caps instead of headscarves. She went to a doctor for help to stop her period.

“I was so young and I didn’t really understand myself,” she says. “I thought if I could stop getting my periods, I would be more masculine.”

If police officers asked for her ID and noticed she was a girl, she says, they would reproach her: “Why are you like this? Go and change your gender.”

This became her ambition. “I was under so much pressure that I wanted to change my gender as soon as possible,” she says.

For seven years Donya had hormone treatment. Her voice became deeper, and she grew facial hair. But when doctors proposed surgery, she spoke to friends who had been through it and experienced “lots of problems”. She began to question whether it was right for her.

“I didn’t have easy access to the internet – lots of websites are blocked. I started to research with the help of some friends who were in Sweden and Norway,” she says.

“I got to know myself better… I accepted that I was a lesbian and I was happy with that.”

But living in Iran as an openly gay man or woman is impossible. Donya, now 33, fled to Turkey with her son from a brief marriage, and then to Canada, where they were granted asylum.

Donya and her son Daniel in Turkey

It’s not official government policy to force gay men or women to undergo gender reassignment but the pressure can be intense. In the 1980’s the founder of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Khomeini, issued a fatwa allowing gender reassignment surgery – apparently after being moved by a meeting with a woman who said she was trapped in a man’s body.

“Start Quote

They show how easy it can be… They promise to give you a loan to pay for the surgery”

ShabnamPsychologist

Shabnam – not her real name – who is a psychologist at a state-run clinic in Iran says some gay people now end up being pushed towards surgery. Doctors are told to tell gay men and women that they are “sick” and need treatment, she says. They usually refer them to clerics who tell them to strengthen their faith by saying their daily prayers properly.

But medical treatments are also offered. And because the authorities “do not know the difference between identity and sexuality”, as Shabnam puts it, doctors tell the patients they need to undergo gender reassignment.

In many countries this procedure involves psychotherapy, hormone treatment and sometimes major life-changing operations – a complex process that takes many years.

That’s not always the case in Iran.

“They show how easy it can be,” Shabnam says. “They promise to give you legal documents and, even before the surgery, permission to walk in the street wearing whatever you like. They promise to give you a loan to pay for the surgery.”

Supporters of the government’s policy argue that transgender Iranians are given help to lead fulfilling lives, and have more freedom than in many other countries. But the concern is that gender reassignment surgery is being offered to people who are not transgender, but homosexual, and may lack the information to know the difference.

“I think a human rights violation is taking place,” says Shabnam. “What makes me sad is that organisations that are supposed to have a humanitarian and therapeutic purpose can take the side of the government, instead of taking care of people.”

Psychologists suggested gender reassignment to Soheil, a gay Iranian 21-year-old.

Soheil in Istanbul

Then his family put him under immense pressure to go through with it.

“My father came to visit me in Tehran with two relatives,” he says. “They’d had a meeting to decide what to do about me… They told me: ‘You need to either have your gender changed or we will kill you and will not let you live in this family.'”

His family kept him at home in the port city of Bandar Abbas and watched him. The day before he was due to have the operation, he managed to escape with the help of some friends. They bought him a plane ticket and he flew to Turkey.

“Start Quote

Surgery did not help reduce my problems – on the contrary, it increased my problems”

Marie

“If I’d gone to the police and told them that I was a homosexual, my life would have been in even more danger than it was from my family,” he says.

There is no reliable information on the number of gender reassignment operations carried out in Iran.

Khabaronline, a pro-government news agency, reports the numbers rising from 170 in 2006 to 370 in 2010. But one doctor from an Iranian hospital told the BBC that he alone carries out more than 200 such operations every year.

Many, like Donya and Soheil, have fled. Usually they go to Turkey, where Iranians don’t need visas. From there they often apply for asylum in a third country in Europe or North America. While they wait – sometimes for years – they may be settled in socially conservative provincial cities, where prejudice and discrimination are commonplace.

Arsham Parsi, who crossed from Iran to Turkey by train in 2005, says that while living in the city of Kayseri, in central Turkey, he was beaten up, and then refused hospital treatment for a dislocated shoulder, simply because he was gay. After that he didn’t leave his house for two months.

Arsham Parsi on train tracks in TurkeyArsham Parsi on the train track that brought him to Turkey

Later he moved to Canada and set up a support group, the Iranian Railroad for Queer Refugees. He says he receives hundreds of inquiries every week, and has helped nearly 1,000 people leave Iran over the past 10 years.

Some are fleeing to avoid gender reassignment surgery, but others have had treatment and find they still face prejudice. Parsi estimates that 45% of those who have had surgery are not transgender but gay.

“You know when you are 16 and they say you’re in the wrong body, and it’s very sweet… you think. ‘Oh I finally worked out what’s wrong with me,'” he says.

When one woman called him from Iran recently with questions about surgery, he asked her if she was transsexual or lesbian. She couldn’t immediately answer – because no-one had ever told her what a “lesbian” was.

Marie, aged 37, is now staying in Kayseri after leaving Iran five months ago. She grew up as a boy, Iman, but was confused about her sexuality and was declared by an Iranian doctor to be 98% female.

“The doctor told me that with the surgery he could change the 2% male features in me to female features, but he could not change the 98% female features to be male,” she says.

After that, she thought she needed to change her gender.

Hormone therapy seemed to bring positive changes. She grew breasts, and her body hair thinned. “It made me feel good,” she says. “I felt beautiful. I felt more attractive to the kinds of partners I used to have.”

But then she had the operation – and came away feeling “physically damaged”.

She had a brief marriage to a man but it broke down, and any hope she had that life would be better as a woman was short-lived.

“Before the surgery people who saw me would say, ‘He’s so girly, he’s so feminine,'” Marie says.

“After the operation whenever I wanted to feel like a woman, or behave like a woman, everybody would say, ‘She looks like a man, she’s manly.’ It did not help reduce my problems. On the contrary, it increased my problems…

“I think now if I were in a free society, I wonder if I would have been like I am now and if I would have changed my gender,” she says. “I am not sure.”

Marie starts to cry.

“I am tired,” she says. “I am tired of my whole life. Tired of everything.”

Source: BBC Persia


Einsortiert unter:Gay, Iran Tagged: Gay, gay peoples, Iran

US-Kongress wird Druck auf Iran erhöhen

$
0
0

Republikanischer Wahlsieg erleichtert neue Sanktionen.

  (Die Presse)

Washington. Die Verhandlungen der USA, Großbritanniens, Frankreichs, Russlands und der EU mit dem Iran über die Beendigung seiner Atomwaffenpläne erhalten durch den Sieg der Republikaner bei den Kongresswahlen neue Dynamik. Jahrelang hat Harry Reid, der demokratische Mehrheitsführer im Senat, verhindert, dass Gesetzesvorschläge für neue Sanktionen auf dem Tisch von Präsident Barack Obama landen. Reid wird nun vom Republikaner Mitch McConnell ersetzt, den Vorsitz im außenpolitischen Ausschuss übernimmt sein Parteikollege Bob Corker.

Einen Vorgeschmack auf die auch gegenüber Obama härtere Gangart des neuen Kongresses lieferte die Weiterleitung eines vertraulichen Briefes des Präsidenten an den iranischen Führer, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, an das „Wall Street Journal“, in dem er um Hilfe im Kampf gegen die Terroristen des Islamischen Staates bittet. Diese Indiskretion, die aus dem Kongress stammen dürfte, bringt Obama unter Druck, bis zur vorläufig auf den 24. November gelegten Frist für eine Einigung keine neuen Zugeständnisse zu machen. Ob Fortschritt möglich ist, hängt nun von einem Treffen der Außenminister der USA und des Iran, John Kerry und Javad Zarif, am Sonntag im Oman ab.


Einsortiert unter:5+1 Gruppe, Ali Khamenei, Ayatollah Khomeini, Civil Rights, Kongress, US-Kongress, USA Tagged: Iran, Kongress, Sanktionen, USA
Viewing all 782 articles
Browse latest View live